Quantcast
Channel: China Headlines on One News Page
Viewing all 64889 articles
Browse latest View live

The Truth About 'Made In China'

$
0
0
Ben Walters was unimpressed the first time he stepped into a Chinese factory.

“It was incredibly primitive,” he said. “Safe but small, and using antiquated equipment. The education of the staff and management was pretty low.”

Walters was searching for a manufacturing facility to make shoes for his footwear company, Ospop. And while that initial visit left much to be desired, in the six years since he's been able to find much better factories, examples of a trend toward improved manufacturing practices and labor conditions in China.

Now, Shanghai-based Ospop works with “totally state-of-the-art” factories that are cleaner, bigger and better organized, Walters said. Even the company's name pays tribute to the countless workers who power China’s unstoppable manufacturing industry: Ospop stands for "One Small Point of Pride," a nod to the hard-working laborers who make and inspire the design of its rubber-soled work shoes.

The biggest difference since he started production in China is the quality of the management, Walters said. Top executives down to the managers overseeing line workers now understand customers’ needs and are able to keep a close eye on production standards.

Technological advancements and increasing regard for safety and quality standards mean Chinese manufacturing has made profound strides over the past decade. Within China, improvements are being driven by external pressure from global retailers that have their products made in Chinese factories, and by a growing labor rights movement, led by workers who are demanding more freedom and better treatment in the workplace.

In recent years, momentum for change has been building, and Chinese manufacturers’ progress is undeniable, said Joe Baladi, head of consulting at the Leo Burnett Institute of Behaviour in Singapore and author of The Brutal Truth About Asian Branding.

“Manufacturing standards have certainly improved over the past decade,” said Baladi. “Working conditions have also improved, relatively speaking."

Yet products manufactured in China -- from cars to children’s toys -- still can’t escape the debilitating reputation shared by consumers in much of the developed world, a reputation that causes problems for even well-meaning brands.

American consumers associate Chinese manufacturing with the terms “mass produced,” “cheap” and “poor safety standards” more than anything else, according to a report from JWTIntelligence, a trends research center.

The country's history as a hub for international brands looking for low-wage labor has "led to a scar" on its image, even though China is no longer a go-to location for cheap manufacturing, said Jessica Vaughn, senior strategist for JWTIntelligence. Most consumers haven’t had particularly awful experiences with Chinese-made products, but “they’re carrying on the perception,” she said.

Moreover, China’s manufacturing reputation is hamstrung by attitudes that go beyond perceptions of bad product quality and workplace safety, according to Baladi, who said there is an “ill-defined malaise” about the Chinese manufacturing sector in the Western world because China is a growing, non-democratic superpower.

According to the JWTIntelligence report, 70 percent of Americans remain wary of China because of its status as a communist nation, even though the country has adopted many free-market policies in recent years. Baladi said the tension is amplified by the complicated, lengthy legacy of Sino-Western relations, with each controversy -- from Chinese hacking scandals to college application schemes -- stirring new negative emotions amongst Americans.

Walters, the Ospop owner, agreed. “It seems the bulk of negative sentiment has moved from distrust of product to something more political," he said.

That means even socially conscious companies that manufacture their wares in China can find themselves tainted by the country’s reputation.

California-based fashion brand Stewart+Brown, which touts itself as an “ethical” apparel company, used to manufacture a small portion of its clothing in China. First, it had clothes made in Hong Kong, but over time, production shifted to the mainland as factories struggled to meet capacity demands and manufacturing costs rose.

Company co-founder Howard Brown turned to a factory used by the outdoor clothing brand Patagonia, which is famous for its devotion to environmental activism and an ethical supply chain. The facility was the first green energy factory on the Chinese mainland.

Although he took extensive precautions to find an ethical factory, Brown immediately felt the fallout of the new “Made in China” label.

“We had some customers who don't buy anything that’s made in China,” he said. Some green and eco-friendly stores flatly refused to carry anything made in China, including Stewart+Brown’s clothing, an embargo that Brown said had a “tangible impact” on the company.

Brown said he never witnessed any labor abuse problems in China firsthand, but quality issues and misinformation from his suppliers forced him cease production there. The company continues to make cashmere clothing in Mongolia and certified organic cotton sweaters in Peru.

China still has significant flaws in its manufacturing practices, like the notoriously grueling work days in factories like Foxconn’s, which manufacture millions of Apple’s glitzy phones and tablets. These problems can be avoided, Brown said, but foreign companies must be meticulous when selecting which plants they agree to do business with.

“The stigmas exist for a reason,” he warned. “You should be really careful if you're manufacturing over there.”

But some experts say that Americans have already come to terms with Chinese manufacturing, even if they don’t want to admit it.

Martin Lindstrom, a branding consultant and the author of Brandwashed: Tricks Companies Use to Manipulate Our Minds and Persuade Us to Buy, said American consumers accept a strong Chinese manufacturing sector as a reality. After all, Americans purchase Chinese-made products every day.

“Americans have gotten used to the fact that everything is Chinese,” said Lindstrom. “You are not accepting it emotionally, but rationally you are." Reported by Huffington Post 12 hours ago.

Why America Doesn't Care If China Gobbles Up Iraq's Oil

$
0
0
Why America Doesn't Care If China Gobbles Up Iraq's Oil Donald Trump is irate.

When he learned that China is gobbling up Iraq's oil — to the tune of more than half its output — he freaked out.

"We spend $1.5 trillion, we lose thousands of lives, we destroy a country … but China is in there taking out all the oil, and we’re getting nothing ... " he said on Fox News.

Alas, Trump is missing the point.

American policy planners probably don't care if China sucks up all that oil.

Here's why:

1. Even as Chinese oil companies lock up the majority of oil from Iraq, four American development companies, including Halliburton, are sucking up half the development dollars that will be spent over the next ten years.

2. The reason Chinese firms are so successful in Iraq is that their companies aren't making much money on the deal. That's right, China is just in a hurry to get the energy in order to propell its massive growth. American firms are more worried about profit, and so have more trouble winning bids (and taking undue risk).

3. U.S. oil companies already develop and purchase oil in (arguably) less dangerous regions (though Exxon did win rights to the Qurna oil field, one of Iraq's largest).

4. Oil is a global commodity. So more oil produced is better for everyone globally. Plus, as Max Fisher of the Washington Post put it, "Chinese-led [demand] spikes" in price per barrel hurt everyone.

So In the eyes of America: let China take the risk (that being, at this moment, a possible civil war in Iraq).

5. The U.S. is set to be the largest exporter of oil by the year 2020. Being the largest exporter of oil when China is the largest importer has strategic significance.

Conversely, there's no reason to believe that China's oil contracts in Iraq will make the country more open to sanctions on Iran.

"China’s efforts to gain new suppliers should not be viewed as attempts to replace older relationships. They are attempts to expand their access to new suppliers who can help them meet future needs," said Mark Cozad, a Rand Corporation expert in strategic intelligence, to Business Insider.

"It’s highly unlikely that this will make China more amenable to sanctions against Iran.  China’s position on Iran is not based solely on its energy relationship.  China’s leadership would argue that its broader interest in Iran is [about] protecting national sovereignty and preventing a strong power from coercing a weaker one," said Cozad.

Join the conversation about this story »

 
 
 
  Reported by Business Insider 11 hours ago.

Free Speech Activist Ai Weiwei Compares U.S. to China

$
0
0
The 2012 documentary Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry captured a Chinese activist whose ability to frustrate his country's freedom-clamping policies made him a hero.

Ai knows what it feels like to live in an oppressive state, which is why his new op-ed in The Guardian should alarm Americans. The activist recoils at the recent news surrounding America's domestic eavesdropping policies, comparing the government's tactics to those he's lived under in China.



Even though we know governments do all kinds of things I was shocked by the information about the US surveillance operation, Prism. To me, it's abusively using government powers to interfere in individuals' privacy....





This abuse of state power goes totally against my understanding of what it means to be a civilised society, and it will be shocking for me if American citizens allow this to continue....



Ai cautions those who may feel such surveillance practices are essential to preventing should consider the bigger picture regarding the power of a country over its people.



In the Soviet Union before, in China today, and even in the US, officials always think what they do is necessary, and firmly believe they do what is best for the state and the people. But the lesson that people should learn from history is the need to limit state power.






 
 
 
  Reported by Breitbart 9 hours ago.

Edward Snowden Speaks Out To South China Morning Post

$
0
0
Edward Snowden spoke out for the first time since revealing his identity, in an exclusive interview with the South China Morning Post.

The newspaper published a preview of the interview with Snowden, the source who leaked the NSA's secret surveillance programs to the media, on Wednesday. He told Post reporter Lana Lam, "I'm neither traitor nor hero. I'm an American." The piece said that "the full story" of their exchange would be available in the newspaper soon.

The South China Morning Post did not report how it got in contact with Snowden or his current whereabouts, saying that he spoke to Lam from a "secret location in Hong Kong."

Snowden has been on the run since the NSA story broke, and fled to Hong Kong from Hawaii. The Guardian's Ewen MacAskill reported that he checked out of Hong Kong's Mira Hotel on Monday, fearing that he would be found. "It is thought he is now in a safe house," MacAskill said on Tuesday.

Lam has been a reporter for SCMP for nearly three years. Reported by Huffington Post 9 hours ago.

Amazon to Expand Kindle E-Reader Availability to China

$
0
0
Amazon has only recently entered the e-book market from China, but that was enough to completely upturn the ecosystem as it were. As it turns out, Amazon is a heavyweight name there already, and companies like China-based Hanvon, which sell their own e-readers there, are worried that their market shares are in danger. Which, truth be told, they are. On the flip side, they aren't exactly resentful of Amazon's entry into their yard. According to a report fr... Reported by Softpedia 9 hours ago.

Is This China’s New Long Range Strike Stealth Aircraft?

$
0
0
Is This China’s New Long Range Strike Stealth Aircraft? The following image, found by Chinese military aviation expert Andreas Rupprecht, shows the shape of what could be a future Chinese stealth bomber plane.

True or false? A model plane or just the base of a future radar evading attack plane?

Hard to say.

For sure, the shape of this alleged LRS (long range strike) stealth aircraft is intriguing and shows input from several existing U.S. planes, including the F-117 Nighthawk and the YF-23.  Furthermore, some of Beijing’s works were leaked in the form scale models during local exhibitions hence, even if unlikely, it is not completely impossible that the one depicted in the photographs and artwork above is the Chinese answer to the Russian sixth-generation pilotless strategic bomber based on the PAK-DA or the American X-51, Falcon HTV-2 and other hypersonic development programs on which U.S.’s perspective strike capability will be based.

China is working a lot on stealth planes.

Last month, few hours before the U.S. Navy launched the the Northrop Grumman X-47B unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV) demonstrator off the deck of an aircraft carrier for the first time, images of China’s first weaponized stealth drone emerged from the Chinese Internet.

Join the conversation about this story »

 
 
 
  Reported by Business Insider 7 hours ago.

Magazine report lifts the lid on US cyberespionage of China

$
0
0
Published in Foreign Policy magazine and called "Inside the NSA's Ultra Secret Hacking Group", the story by Mathew Aid lifts the lid on the US's covert cyber operations in China. The US continually accuses China of cybercrime. However, senior Beijing officials accuse the US government of hypocrisy and allege Washington is also actively engaged in cyber-espionage. Reported by S.China Morning Post 3 hours ago.

6 a minute in China told they have cancer

$
0
0
SIX people are diagnosed with cancer every minute in China and young people and the elderly are most at risk, according to medical experts cited in a report in the bi-monthly China Comment journal. Reported by Shanghai Daily 6 hours ago.

Edward Snowden Reportedly Showed Hong Kong Newspaper Documents Revealing US Hacking Attacks On China

$
0
0
Edward Snowden Reportedly Showed Hong Kong Newspaper Documents Revealing US Hacking Attacks On China NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden has told a Hong Kong newspaper that the U.S. government has been hacking Hong Kong and Chinese networks since for at least four years.

The comments were made as part of the South China Morning Post's exclusive interview with Snowden — his first since revealing himself on Sunday.

Snowden reportedly showed reporter Lana Lam documents that showed NSA had been hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009. He estimated there were hundreds of targets in Hong Kong and mainland China, including the Chinese University of Hong Kong. None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese military systems, Snowden said.

“We hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically – that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,” Snowden told Lam.

China's own online espionage efforts were put in the spotlight earlier this year after a report from U.S. security firm Mandiant that accused military-linked groups of hacking major U.S. companies. After that story, China hit back saying Washington was the "real hacking empire."

Join the conversation about this story »

 
 
 
  Reported by Business Insider 6 hours ago.

Gordon Chang: Snowden May Trade Info 'for Refuge' in China

$
0
0
Edward Snowden is planning to defect to China to protect himself from U.S. extradition laws, author and China expert Gordon Chang says. Reported by Newsmax 6 hours ago.

Bill Chameides: Climate Change: China, U.S. Bring Toy Fire Truck to Seven-Alarm Fire

$
0
0
A special report by the International Energy Agency offers a sobering picture of where the world is in terms of addressing climate change. In sum, we're behind. To get us back on track relatively quickly, the IEA recommends four steps, including reducing methane emissions from oil and gas production. (Rob_Ellis/istockphoto.com)

Global greenhouse gas emissions are higher than ever. What's to be done?

*"Redrawing the Energy-Climate Map,"* a special report [pdf] by the International Energy Agency (IEA), was released on Monday, and the findings are sobering.

In 2012 energy-related, global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reached their highest levels ever at 31.6 gigatons, a data point to go along with the fact that last month CO2 surpassed the 400 parts-per-million mark for the first time in perhaps several million years.

Virtually all of that increase can be attributed to emission increases in developing countries (i.e., countries not belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development or OECD), with China making the largest single contribution. All in all, non-OECD countries now account for 60 percent of all global emissions; in 2000 that percentage was 45.

(And before we OECD country-ites pat ourselves on the back for our climate-change enlightenment and point fingers at the "Third World"-ers, let's not forget that a lot of those increasing emissions in non-OECD countries are to produce cheap goods for us to import and consume.)

The report did point to some positive signs:




· Emissions from the United States dropped by 3.8 percent in 2012 primarily due to fuel switching from coal to natural gas;


· Emissions from the European Union dropped by 1.4 percent; and


· China's "growth was one of the lowest it has seen in a decade, driven largely by the deployment of renewables and a significant improvement in the energy intensity of its economy."




*Bleak Prediction for Keeping Climate Change in Check*

The IEA's assessment of where we are headed is pretty bleak. The authors write:


"*The world is not on track to meet the target agreed by governments to limit the long-term rise in the average global temperature to 2 degrees Celsius (°C). *... Policies that have been implemented, or are now being pursued, suggest that the long-term average temperature increase is more likely to be between 3.6 °C and 5.3 °C (compared with pre-industrial levels), with most of the increase occurring this century."


*IEA's Recipe for Averting Dangerous Climate Change*

But all is *not* lost, according to the report. The world can still meet the 2-degree Celsius target, the agency claims, and it's not all that difficult. Because "the energy sector accounts for around two-thirds of greenhouse-gas emissions," thanks to heavy energy consumption worldwide of fossil fuels, key to meeting the challenge is targeting energy, the report argues, and it prescribes four steps for "intensive action ... required by 2020," all involving existing and/or available policies and technologies:




· Improving energy-efficiency in industry, transportation and buildings, specifically through energy-cutting measures in:




· "new space and water heating, as well as cooling equipment͖,"


· "lighting and new appliances͖,"


· "new industrial motor systems͖" and


· "standards for new vehicles in road transport";







· Cutting emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas some 20 times more powerful at trapping heat than CO2, in oil and gas production;


· "Limiting the use and construction of inefficient coal-fired power plants"; and


· Phasing out subsidies for fossil fuels.




The IEA stresses throughout that these actions (which they call the "4-for-2 °C Scenario") should be taken swiftly and collectively to buy us time to 2020, when a new international climate treaty is expected to take effect (2015 is the target year for reaching a new post-Kyoto, global agreement). In other words these are "a bridge to further action" and a bridge that needs to be built and crossed ASAP.

*U.S.-China Response*

In case you missed it, President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping had an historic, two-day summit last week at the Annenberg Retreat at Sunnylands in Rancho Mirage, California. That's right Rancho Mirage. You gotta hand it to the PR folks at the White House -- what better place to hold the first face-to-face meeting between the two world leaders than in a place called mirage?

Mirage or no mirage, the meetings, we are told, covered a wide range of topics including climate change. And lo and behold, the leaders of the two largest emitters of greenhouse gases came to an agreement to address the problem of climate change.

Was it a visionary and bold plan to address emissions from the energy sector? No. Was it a more modest but groundbreaking plan along the lines of that proposed by the IEA? Again, no.

What Obama and Xi agreed to do was work on eliminating emissions of hydriofluorocarbons (HFCs).

*About HFCs*

HFCs are manmade chemicals used in refrigerants. Back in the mid-70s scientists discovered that the chlorofluorocarbons (or CFCs also known by the trade name Freon) that were used in items like aerosol cans and refrigerants were depleting the ozone layer, an important part of the atmosphere that protects us from, among other things, skin cancer. To stop that depletion, CFCs were eventually phased out and replaced by hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), but, as it turned out, those too depleted the ozone layer (though not quite as much), and so they were phased out and replaced by HFCs.

The good news with HFCs is that they do not affect the stratosphere. The bad news is they are a greenhouse gas and can be 14,800 times more potent than CO2 at warming the atmosphere.

So, don't get me wrong. Obviously there are global-warming benefits to eradicating HFCs. In fact, I've written in support of it. And the IEA report, while not including it in its four-point action plan, highlights HFCs along with other "short-lived climate pollutants" (SLCPs) -- black carbon, methane and tropospheric ozone -- as warmers responsible for a "substantial fraction of the radiative forcing to date" and thus good warmers to reduce but as a "complement" to actions that reduce CO2 emissions. To quote the report:


"[L]asting climate benefits from fast action on SLCPs are contingent on stringent parallel action on longer-lasting CO2 emissions. In other words, while fast action to mitigate SLCPs could help slow the rate of climate change and improve the chances of staying below the 2 °C target in the near term, longer term climate protection depends on deep and persistent cuts in CO2 emissions being rapidly realised."


So, given all the other positive areas for collaboration on addressing climate change that the two countries could pursue -- R&D on green technologies, advancing technologies like carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS), building sustainable cities, greening transportation, and establishing and enforcing solid environmental laws [pdf], etc. -- limiting the global-warming-reducing measures to eliminating HFCs seems, at least from where I sit, a bit of a disappointment. More of a mirage than a real plan to tackle climate change.

Ironically, much of the world's climate-change woes could be alleviated if just the United States and China, by themselves, entered into a bilateral agreement to curtail CO2 emissions. You think, maybe Obama and Xi are saving that one for their next summit? Hopefully to be held at the Garden of Facing Realities.

*Crossposted with TheGreenGrok and National Geographic's Great Energy Challenge blog
Find us on Facebook* Reported by Huffington Post 6 hours ago.

Terry Savage: China: Friend or Foe?

$
0
0
Americans have grown up with the belief that the United States is the center of the universe -- economically, politically, and militarily. But now we are being challenged in a new global economic battle, one that will take some tricky navigation to lead us to economic success.

Seniors remember winning World War II and the generous Marshall Plan that helped Europe recover. Helping former enemies created global growth that helped America rebound. Baby Boomers remember Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the table and threatening to bury us -- only to watch the Soviet Union capitulate, the Berlin Wall torn down, and the spread of Western economics. Gen X and Gen Y came to maturity in a period of technology expansion that led to increased prosperity.

Only in the past few years has America's bright promise faced challenges, seemingly on all fronts. Our debts are mounting, our jobs continue to disappear, and the costs of fighting a global war against terrorism are impacting our domestic economy.

Plus, on the international front, we have a new economic challenge in the growth of China. Unlike those decades when we fought the Cold War with the Soviet Union, it's not so easy to decide whether we are confronting an enemy or a trading partner or a rescuer.

Perhaps, it's a bit of all three. But we cannot afford to be ignorant of the drama that will be central to determining our future. And we cannot let domestic political considerations override economic reality.

*China: Friend or Foe?*

The issues of dealing with China were front and center in the recent summit between President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Here are some of the critical economic issues that must be navigated:

• China lends money to the U.S.
The one issue that is not debated, but underlies all other issues is the fact that China now holds more than $1 trillion of our national debt. That is, they are lending us money - and currently, they are lending us money to finance our deficits at a very low rate.

Of course, it may be argued that this is in China's best interests, as well. They keep America's economy going, so that Americans are in a position to buy more "stuff" made in China! That keeps their system growing and creates Chinese prosperity. Still, America is the debtor nation -- and that gives China an unspoken edge that America has never previously had to face.

• America needs Chinese economic growth.
Now there's the great irony of our situation. Our stock market reacts as much to reports of Chinese economic growth (or lack of it), as it does to our own economic reports. When it appears China's growth is slowing, our stock market falls. Bad news for China's economy calls into question the growth rate of many American businesses that trade with China, as well as the possibilities for global economic growth. The Chinese have become consumers, as well as producers.

• China's currency is not (yet) freely traded.
China is moving toward a freely traded currency, so that future as currency exchange rates will reflect economic differences, adjusting costs of traded products, just as markets now do between the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, the Euro, and the Yen. Eventually freely-traded currency markets will help balance out the cost to America of Chinese imports. Until then, Chinese imports will look "cheap" to American buyers.

But China will not be bullied into allowing its currency to be freely traded. Just as Japan has intervened in its markets to make its currency (and exports) appear "cheap" to global buyers of Japanese products, the Chinese "intervene" by fixing exchange rates, to keep their exports attractive, as well.

• China challenges cyber-security and U.S. patents.
That accusation is well-documented. Theft of patented technology, pirated intellectual property, and outright cyber-penetration of government and corporate secrets is well documented. Coming to agreement on these issues requires a common acceptance of basic standards. Even in war, there are global conventions accepted by both sides. But that kind of mutual agreement on the basics has, so far, remained elusive. How can you come to an economic agreement, if you can't find some grounds for trust?

• America needs China to create stability in Asia.
Specifically, China is North Korea's largest donor of aid, foreign investor and trading partner. Given the inability of the United States to prevail on North Korea in any meaningful way, it is essential that China become involved. In fact, experts see this week's meeting between North and South Korean representatives -- the first communication in months -- as a direct result of pressure from the Chinese, demonstrating their power in advance of the Presidential summit.

Global trade is truly an American domestic economic issue -- and China plays a far greater role than merely as a producer of low-cost products. Its demands for natural resources, and its Asian presence have a direct bearing on America's economic well-being.

So, is China friend, or foe? Are we rooting for the success of their economy, or their failure? In recent months, we have seen reports that Chinese imports have fallen, reflecting a slowdown in domestic demand. If China slows, do we cheer and claim victory -- or suffer along with them? If their credit bubble bursts, do we worry that their domestic economic problems could cause them to withdraw their bids for global companies, resources and products?

As in all generations, America will be tested by a new global configuration. And unless we get it right economically as well as politically, the outcome will be costly. That's the Savage Truth. Reported by Huffington Post 6 hours ago.

Chicago Urban League Teams Up With United Airlines to Fly Local High School Students to China

$
0
0
CHICAGO, June 12, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- The Chicago Urban League in conjunction with the China-United States Exchange Foundation and United Airlines will lead Chicago high school students on an educational, cultural and social journey-of-a-lifetime through China. More than... Reported by PR Newswire 5 hours ago.

United Airlines to fly Chicago students to China

$
0
0
Chicago-based United Airlines (NYSE: UAL), the Chicago Urban League and the China-United States Exchange Foundation have joined forces to take more than 20 Chicago high school students on an educational, cultural and social journey through China. The students will fly to China courtesy of United Airlines. The lucky students from more than 15 Chicago public and charter schools will spend two weeks — June 22 to July 6 — traveling to Beijing, Shanghai and other Chinese cities. Students were selected… Reported by bizjournals 4 hours ago.

China is testing out cap-and-trade — but will it actually work?

$
0
0
It will be nearly impossible for the world to get a grip on climate change unless China, which produces one-fourth of the world's carbon-dioxide pollution, can rein in its own emissions. So it's worth keeping an eye on China's efforts there.

Read full article >>

 
 
 
  Reported by Washington Post 3 hours ago.

Snowden: 61K Worldwide NSA Hacking Operations Including China

$
0
0
Speaking to the South China Morning Post, Edward Snowden has revealed the NSA has been hacking computers since 2009, including computers in China.  "Snowden said that according to unverified documents seen by the Post, the NSA had been hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009. None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese military systems, he said."

Snowden estimated more than 61,000 operations globally. “We hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically – that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,” he said. “Last week the American government happily operated in the shadows with no respect for the consent of the governed, but no longer. Every level of society is demanding accountability and oversight.”

Releasing the previously classified information "demonstrated the hypocrisy of the US government when it claims that it does not target civilian infrastructure, unlike its adversaries."

Asked about asylum, Snowden claimed the US was bullying other countries. "All I can do is rely on my training and hope that world governments will refuse to be bullied by the United States into persecuting people seeking political refuge." As to whether he had been offered asylum from Russia, he responded, "My only comment is that I am glad there are governments that refuse to be intimidated by great power."

The South China Morning Post has been gradually releasing parts of an hour-long interview with Snowden over the course of the day. 

 
 
 
  Reported by Breitbart 3 hours ago.

Lockheed to Secure Nuke Plants in China

$
0
0
Filed under: Investing

What would you say if I told you that America's nuclear power plant regulators had hired the biggest defense contractor in China to design the safety protocols for American nuke plants?

Actually, it probably doesn't matter what you would say. This is a scenario that will happen exactly ... never. But the reverse isn't true. On Thursday, America's biggest pure-play defense contracting firm -- *Lockheed Martin* -- announced that it has won a contract to prototype, manufacture, and qualify the protection systems for China's Generation III nuclear power plant reactors. 

Specifically, China's State Nuclear Power Automation System Engineering Company (SNPAS) has hired Lockheed to develop a nuclear safety instrumentation and control platform based on field programmable gate array, or FPGA, technology.




According to Lockheed, the FGPA-based platform "will specifically address safety and regulatory concerns related to software common-cause failures in digital nuclear safety systems. These systems will autonomously and reliably monitor and detect potential failures in the system, ensuring the safe operation and function of the facility. The platform may be applied both in new plant deployment and in safety system upgrades for existing power plants."

Financial terms were not disclosed.

The article Lockheed to Secure Nuke Plants in China Reported by DailyFinance 2 hours ago.

Edward Snowden Says U.S. Has Been Hacking China, Hong Kong for Years

$
0
0
Edward Snowden Says U.S. Has Been Hacking China, Hong Kong for Years Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who previously exposed the National Security Agency's (NSA) spying on U.S. citizens via phones and the web, dropped another bombshell today.

Now, Snowden claims that the U.S. government has been hacking into computers in Hong Kong and China since 2009.

Snowden gave an interview to the South China Morning Post in a secret location that was not disclosed.

According to Snowden, there are more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations around the world.

“We hack network backbones, like huge internet routers, basically, that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,” explained Snowden.

“Last week the American government happily operated in the shadows with no respect for the consent of the governed, but no longer. Every level of society is demanding accountability and oversight.”

Snowden also slammed “the hypocrisy of the U.S. government when it claims that it does not target civilian infrastructure, unlike its adversaries. Not only does it do so, but it is so afraid of this being known that it is willing to use any means, such as diplomatic intimidation, to prevent this information from becoming public.”

Snowden said that he has not spoken to his family or friends since exposing the NSA last week.

“All I can do is rely on my training and hope that world governments will refuse to be bullied by the United States into persecuting people seeking political refuge,” added the 29 year old.

When asked about Russia possibly offering asylum, Snowden replied: “My only comment is that I am glad there are governments that refuse to be intimidated by great power."

Snowden was also asked about the thousands of supporters who have signed a petition calling for his pardon in the U.S. and a financial fund created by supporters.

“I’m very grateful for the support of the public,” Snowden said. “But I ask that they act in their interest, save their money for letters to the government that breaks the law and claims it noble.

“The reality is that I have acted at great personal risk to help the public of the world, regardless of whether that public is American, European, or Asian.”

Source: South China Morning Post Reported by Opposing Views 1 hour ago.

Edward Snowden: "The US Government Has Been Hacking China For Years", Meet TAO

$
0
0
It's a good thing Obama and Xi met last week, because following the latest revelations by Edward Snowden, just released as part of an ongoing series of interviews posted by Hong Kong's South China Morning Post, there may have been some very awkward silence between the leaders of the world's superpowers. Especially since what he revealed once again exposes the US as nothing but a schoolyard hypocrite bully, which has been spinning a PR campaign "exposing" Chinese hackers as the biggest threat to transparency, when in reality it was the US that has done the bulk of snooping on Chinese soil.

From SCMP:



Snowden said that according to unverified documents seen by the Post, the NSA had been hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009. None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese military systems, he said.

 

One of the targets in the SAR, according to Snowden, was Chinese University and public officials, businesses and students in the city. The documents also point to hacking activity by the NSA against mainland targets.

 

Snowden believed there had been more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations globally, with hundreds of targets in Hong Kong and on the mainland.

 

“*We hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically – that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one*,” he said.

 

“Last week the American government happily operated in the shadows with no respect for the consent of the governed, but no longer. Every level of society is demanding accountability and oversight.”

 

Snowden said he was releasing the information to *demonstrate “the hypocrisy of the US government when it claims that it does not target civilian infrastructure, unlike its adversaries”.*

 

*“Not only does it do so, but it is so afraid of this being known that it is willing to use any means, such as diplomatic intimidation, to prevent this information from becoming public.*”

 

If true, Snowden's allegations lend credence to China's longstanding position that it is as much a victim of hacking as a perpetrator, after Obama pressed Xi to rein in cyber-espionage by the Chinese military.



The irony continues because in world in which China suddenly has the moral superiority to an America, that is more reminiscent to the "Evil Empire" USSR from the 1950s than anything the founders had envisioned, it is Russia that Snowden exposes as the country not afraid to stand up to the world's most arrogant bully:



Asked if he had been offered asylum by the Russian government, he said: “My only comment is that I am glad there are governments that refuse to be intimidated by great power”.



Here SCMP reverts to FP magazine to present the NSA's Tailored Access Operations or TAO:



Published in Foreign Policy magazine and called "Inside the NSA's Ultra Secret Hacking Group", the story by Mathew Aid lifts the lid on the US's covert cyber operations in China. The US continually accuses China of cybercrime. However, senior Beijing officials accuse the US government of hypocrisy and allege Washington is also actively engaged in cyber-espionage.

 

"The Chinese government's allegations are essentially correct," the article reveals. "*According to a number of confidential sources, a highly secretive unit of the National Security Agency (NSA), the US government's huge electronic eavesdropping organisation, called the Office of Tailored Access Operations, or TAO*, *has successfully penetrated Chinese computer and telecommunications systems for almost 15 years, generating some of the best and most reliable intelligence information about what is going on inside China."*

 

When the latest allegation of Chinese cyber-espionage was made last month, it alleged hackers employed by the Chinese military had stolen the blueprints of more than three dozen American weapons systems. The Chinese government's top internet official, Huang Chengqing, responded that Beijing possessed "mountains of data" showing the US has engaged in widespread hacking to steal Chinese government secrets.

 

Revelations about the NSA's Prism operation from former CIA undercover operative Edward Snowden have added fuel to Beijing's stance, and Foreign Policy's exposé confirms China's claims.

 

"*According to former NSA officials … TAO's mission is simple. It collects intelligence information on foreign targets by surreptitiously hacking into their computers and telecommunications systems, and then copying all the messages and data traffic passing within the targeted e-mail and text-messaging systems*," the story revealed.

 

"TAO is also responsible for developing the information that would allow the United States to destroy or damage foreign computer and telecommunications systems with a cyber attack if so directed by the president. *TAO, sources say, is now the largest and arguably the most important component of the NSA's huge intelligence gathering network*."



Back to Snowden and his conclusion:



*“I’m very grateful for the support of the public,” he said. “But I ask that they act in their interest – save their money for letters to the government that breaks the law and claims it noble.*

 

“The reality is that I have acted at great personal risk to help the public of the world, regardless of whether that public is American, European, or Asian.”



We can only hope that the same public will care. Reported by Zero Hedge 25 minutes ago.

Artisan Business Group to Lead Senior Care Industry Trade Mission to Shanghai, China

$
0
0
Artisan Business Group Inc., will lead 2013 China Senior Care Business and Investment Exploratory Trade Mission to Shanghai August 19-24, 2013

Chicago, IL (PRWEB) June 12, 2013

Mr. Brian Su, CEO of Artisan Business Group Inc., will lead The 2013 China Senior Care Business and Investment Exploratory Trade Mission to Shanghai, August 19-24, 2013. The China Senior Care Business and Investment Delegation provides a unique opportunity to explore the emerging senior care industry and investment opportunities throughout China and meet with leading professionals in this industry.

The China Senior Care Business and Investment Delegation will allow participants to promote their company’s services and products to the emerging China senior care market. The senior care delegation’s core objective is bringing US business executives to meet their potential senior care partners in China. The main attraction during the exploratory delegation is attending the 2013 International Senior Care Show with the option to display your own exhibitor booth during the show. The International Care Show 2013 is a mixed event featuring a trade show, business match-making services, vocational training and technical seminars. The delegation will also have the unique opportunity to tour Chinese senior care facilities and meet with the top management of the facilities. The touring of large senior housing, assisted living facilities and specialized care throughout Shanghai will provide the participants an eye-opening experience. This exploratory delegation gives you the platform to form productive working relationships to conduct future business in China’s senior care industry. It provides US operators, distributors, suppliers, manufacturers and agents the chance to meet worldwide senior care operators, real estate developers, investors and consulting firms in an international setting with trade opportunities, education and business networking. EB-5 project developers who are seeking EB-5 capital for assisted living, senior housing and memory care facilities are welcome to join.

Artisan Business Group is a US-China Market Entry Consultant focusing on connecting professionals from both countries in accomplishing their business goals. For more information about participation information about this trade mission, log on http://www.ArtisanBusinessTours.com

Press Contact:

Mr. Tyler McKay
1.217.899.6661
Artisan Business Group, Inc.
http://www.ArtisanBusinessTours.com Reported by PRWeb 5 minutes ago.
Viewing all 64889 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>